The Basics of Union Arbitration Decisions

Spread the love

Union arbitration decisions play a pivotal role in resolving disputes between employers and unionized employees. Arbitration is a common method used in labor relations to settle grievances, contract disagreements, or disputes over disciplinary actions. It involves a neutral third party, the arbitrator, who listens to both sides and makes a binding decision.


Video Source

To better understand the process, let’s break down the basics of union arbitration decisions.

1. What is Union Arbitration?
Union arbitration is a form of dispute resolution designed to handle conflicts that arise under a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between a union and an employer. Rather than going to court, the parties agree to have a neutral arbitrator decide the matter. The arbitrator’s decision is legally binding, meaning both parties must adhere to the ruling.

Union arbitration is typically used to resolve two main types of disputes:

Grievances: These occur when employees believe their rights under the CBA have been violated. For example, an employee may file a grievance if they feel they were wrongfully terminated or disciplined.

Contract Disputes: These arise when the union and the employer disagree over the interpretation or implementation of the terms in the CBA.

2. How Does the Arbitration Process Work?
The union arbitration process usually follows several key steps:

Filing a Grievance: The process begins when a union or an employee files a grievance, typically through a formal complaint to the employer. This grievance must relate to an issue covered under the collective bargaining agreement.

Selection of Arbitrator: Both the union and the employer choose an arbitrator, often from a list of qualified individuals, either mutually agreed upon or provided by an arbitration organization. The arbitrator must be neutral and have expertise in labor law or industry-specific issues.

Hearing: During the arbitration hearing, both sides present their case, including evidence, documentation, and witness testimonies. The union and employer both argue their interpretations of the CBA, or the reasons for the grievance or disciplinary action.

Deliberation: After hearing both sides, the arbitrator will review the evidence and arguments before rendering a decision.

Decision: The arbitrator issues a binding decision, known as an award, which typically includes the resolution of the dispute, any required actions from the employer or the union, and any remedies, such as back pay or reinstatement of an employee.

3. Factors That Influence Union Arbitration Decisions
Several factors influence the arbitrator’s decision:

The Collective Bargaining Agreement: The CBA is the foundation of any arbitration decision. Arbitrators rely on the language and terms of the agreement to guide their judgment, including the rights and obligations of both the employer and employees.

Past Practice: Arbitrators often look at past practices between the union and the employer to determine whether there has been a consistent way of handling similar issues. This can help interpret vague or unclear contract language.

Precedent: Arbitrators may consider previous arbitration decisions in similar cases, especially if they set a pattern for handling certain types of disputes.

Fairness: While arbitration is based on the CBA, arbitrators also consider the fairness of the situation, ensuring that the decision upholds principles of justice within the boundaries of the agreement.

4. Finality of Union Arbitration Decisions
A crucial aspect of union arbitration is the binding nature of the decision. Once the arbitrator renders their decision, both parties are obligated to comply, and the ruling cannot be appealed in most cases. Courts generally uphold arbitration awards, provided the arbitrator acted within the scope of their authority and followed the terms of the CBA. However, if either party believes the arbitrator’s ruling violates public policy or was made through fraudulent means, they can challenge the decision in court, though such challenges are rare and often unsuccessful.

About The Author

Scroll to Top